Muzzling The Proletariat

America is being shoved off its soapbox:
Louis Farrakhan spoke at UC Berkeley last weekend in blistering tones against the Khazakh-controlled media that offended some of his audience. A TV news clip reported it, but you'll never see it anywhere (including YouTube) as it was yanked less than 24 hours afterward - presumably because the Khazar station manager got offended. The only media reference CFN can locate is this You Tube clip of a debate about the speech. The Establishment has been squelching Ron Paul the entire election cycle, but why should the CON-servatives care: It doesn't involve them. Under these circumstances, I echo the sentiments expressed by UC Berkeley, that we cannot retreat from the value of free speech.
No one could be more opposed to much of Minister Farrakhan's racist rhetoric than Galt-in-Da-Box, and Ron Paul's lamentable devotion to the Papistocracy's "pro-life" faction also gives us pause, but censorship is the cowardly action of tyrants and their bootlickers; a general indication their position is too weak to withstand criticism. The alternative under 0bammunism appears to be that you are to be barely seen or heard, so as to be easily ignored (think townhalls on HITLERy"Obama"care).
The sad tendency of oppressed people is to give in to the oppressors until it is too late to resist.

Sez It All

History Repeats Itself...

...but is never heard.

Of course, such plans are expensive, so you have to take everything away from those who have earned it - including their ability to defend themselves - give it to your bosses and cronies under the guise of "he'ppin' aw de poah folk", make a bunch of freaking excuses to dispose of due process & establish a tyrannic and brutal military dictatorship to impose your Executive Orders (bitch-slap around any nation or person who won't do the will of the BanKhazars).
There are none more blind than those who deliberately refuse to see, due to their fanatical faith in the lie of something-for-nothing.

Untie It, Rush

The greatest benefit of free speech is how easily it allows one to identify morons.
Case in point Rush Limbaugh's most recent attack of foot-in-mouth disorder. Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned, and since most American women are Democrats, El-Rushbo's typical Khazar arrogance touched off a firestorm that made Hell look like a lit match! "Limburger" has - since his alleged dope detox - rarely been as humorous or logical as he was in his early days. Instead of humor and honesty which were at one time his hallmarks of Excellence In Broadcasting, most of his radio program consists of railing and rants against the various factions and GIMME-groups of the DNC. "Conservative" or "Liberal" Establishment collectivists tend to substitute vitriol for viability when their spineless, miasmic and miopic self-serving goals are not achieved: John Boehner bawls. Fred Phelps spews. Bill Maher rails. Chris Matthews falsely accuses. Rush rants. There's too much a reminder of the worst of schoolday classmates, tinged with those you go back aways with - you know, the kind that never grew up.
More prevalent among Powerful, Influencial Members of the Press (PIMPs, for short) is the disgusting habit of saying anything to get attention, because attention - positive or negative - is a PIMPs gateway to ratings and money. There's nothing a preacher, politician or pundit loves more than another fifteen minutes of fame. This is the basis of yellow journalism! It's the secret of Alex Jones' success and why sensationalist tabloids like Enquirer and Weekly World News remain so revered in the eyes of their tenament slum readers. The sad devotion of many Libertarians to such "alternative news" sources explains much of their failure to achieve power.
Personally, I see little correlation on a daily basis between media dreck and the real world, especially that propounded by punditry. Once you realize these people largely are "in it for the Benjamins" or their ego, the hype fades away. I regret to inform you that Edward R. Murrow is dead, and has been for some time now: Substantive, investigative reporting has given way to lap-dog infotainment. One of "Maja Rushi"s favorite claims is that he's doing his show (and that's ALL it is, BTW) with half his brain tied behind his back.
Well, maybe it's time to untie that other half, "just to make it fair".

Law Of Causality

Since the minions of The Protestant Inquisitor are still torturing Mr. Beale, Galt-in-Da-Box thought this would be an excellent opportunity to expand on this oft-willfully-ignored and predominate aspect of Natural Law.
First, unlike man-made laws, rules and commandments which are subject to change with the whims, greed & lust of politricksters, Natural Law is immutable: If you put two parts hydrogen & one part oxygen together, you ALWAYS get water. If you drop an object, it will fall toward the point of gravity, never away from it. Causality is the same way.
The law of causality has been rephrased by many people on different aspects and in various ways, but whether you call it Divine retribution, natural selection, evolution or action-reaction, simply stated it is that every effect has a cause, and every cause has an effect.
The law has two sides to it, also: positive causes have beneficial effects, while negative causes have consequencial effects. When it comes to human beings, difficulties arise from either the gross inability or willingness to discern this law, the sides thereof, and the difference between effect and cause.
Atleast half the people I have met expect beneficial effects without generating a cause, or good effects from bad causes: The former want to live like Aristotle Onassis at someone else's expense. The latter feel they can bully and coerce this lifestyle from others. Come to think of it, it's more like 3/4 of the people I've met, and it's a wonder society is not a complete and utter ruin.
The only thing that has prevented that ruin is that, up to now, the other portion of society has been extremely creative and productive, giving little to no thought to the moochers and pull-peddlers who feed off of them. It's only recently I've come to realize this mindset is self-defense, not naivete.
The self-defense aspect comes by mastery of yet another Natural Law, which is that whatever a person believes (habitually thinks, confesses, acts upon) absolutely becomes manifested in their lives. For some, it's so automatic they are hardly - if at all - aware of it. For others, it took slight honing of natural talent, or much time and self-discipline, but brought extraordinary achievement and rewards. And for others, a rather moderate living as they wasted their lives "keeping up with the Joneses".
The reason so few succeed and so many don't or settle for mediocre has nothing to do with luck, chance, fate, or the breaks and everything to do with believing, causality, and the fact that anyone can fail; it requires no thought or effort at all!

Crackpot Woos Potheads

Note to cannibophiles: This man is NOT your friend!
You might be tempted to feel otherwise, but "ped-piehole Pat" has a blatant track record of Rush LimBILGEry: He will say and do ANYTHING to get fifteen more minutes of fame...Positive or negative. I do not buy his sudden discovery of Libertarianism for half a New York second. I never touch the stuff myself, and have no ill-sentiments against those who do, however religion is never the friend of any species of liberty - especially ROBBERtson's brand of Southern Deadfish omniderigence (blame God for the consequences of your personal stupidity/evil) and GIMME-ism. Galt-in-Da-Box just gots to wonder what his catch is.
Wouldn't it be amazing if the 700 Club guru was pushing this line because he's partial to Da Gonge himself (or not)?

Reed Gets Run

*FX: Long, loud buzzer signifying a WRONG ANSWER*
Aw Fred, that was a base-line grounder at best. Looks like a little batting practice is in order!
Seriously, I understand about rooting for the home team and all (especially when they'll cut your freaking throat, laugh while you're bleeding to death & dance around/ass-rape your corpse, if you don't) but you don't have an accurate grasp of the concept. Nobody has a problem with Pedro coming to America, working hard and making a living - least of all Democrats who appreciate his dead vote and fellow GeOPapist Republicans who want his cheap labor - its hees perra y feefteen cucharachas living off US thoughtlessly via Uncle Sam that sodomizes your paradigm: You can't support the average turd-world, Papist, non-contraception-using family on $4/hour under the table.
Not an unrelated factor is, if you are white and productive, you have to jump through all the hoops of the system to get in here, whereas if you're neither, Comrades Obama & Holder, the Roman Catholic cult and countless other deadbeats' "rights" altruists will happily cut all the red tape and hand you tons of other people's money to do nothing but take up space & breed!
And if you feel your entitlements"rights" are being violated by, say, that vehicle or home owner who didn't like the idea of being stabbed to death by a drunken gang of illegals and shot one who was trying it, you can always run bawling to the ACLU, La Raza or similar outfits, get no-cost legal representation and off Scot free/sue the victim and thus rob him LEGALLY after all attempts to rob him illegally have failed.
Since you brought it up, let's tackle that pissy, moany, whiny "grinding poverty" issue fine folks like yourself always seem to cower behind: With the obvious exception of physical disability, there are no "those less fortunate", only those less diligent. It's always amazed me that in neighborhoods with high unemployment, nobody ever seems to have time to keep their homes and lawns tidy. The money excuse is negated by Der Welfare Schtaat and their presence on the front porch with a joint and a "40-ounce". Note how the countries where people are prospering are also the ones where the government isn't borrowing itself into the grave and stealing them blind for the altruistic excuse of "he'ppin' aw de poah folk" - it's a subtle indicator of why America isn't wealthy or prospering any longer!
These, and countless other related issues Mr. Reed, are why you are braindead-wrong on this matter.
Have a nice day!